1.) What is your game about?**
The game us about taking the power away from the system and putting it on the player. Almost everyone has played a fantasy RPG before. More and more, it is my feeling that systems have added in so many shortcuts to “uberness.” Feats, spells, powerz and so on IMO really rob players of the chance to really show how clever and awesome they can be during play. Instead, all these shortcuts just encourage them to look for the pre-defined optimal sequence of bonuses. “Choose feat X because it’s clearly the best at that level. Choose spell Y because at that phase in the game, it’s by far the most versatile.” Or even worse in cases where something like a longsword is vastly superior to a broadsword and therefore there is zero incentive to ever pick anything else. This sort of mentality bugs me. I got tired of DnD because once I found the optimum Feat, Stat, Spell, and bonuses for the type of character I wanted to play, the challenge was over. Low Power Fantasy puts the challenge totally on me. It’s about forcing the players to use their creativity in each and every contest.
2.) What do the characters do?**
Characters work toward a their destinies. Players choose a destiny for their character during chargen. It could be anything from “find my father” to “become king of my country.” The actions of the character drive toward that destiny during player-determined intervals of the game. When a character reaches their destiny, they retire.
3.) What do the players (including the GM if there is one) do?**
Players focus on strategy and tactics during contests. In combat, they have an array of options that can change and morph each time they are faced with a new enemy. The characters are limited only by the player’s imagination and ability to communicate what he wants the character to do. Check out the fight scene between Jonny Depp and Orlando Bloom in the smithy in the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie. Or checkout practically anything Legolas does in any of the LotR movies. Everything you see going on there is tested and proven possible during play for Low Power Fantasy. In parlay, they are options are just as varied. Interrogation, diplomacy, debating, all take on a swashbuckling flair as players go back and forth trying to get what they want. But without players actively challenging themselves to be original and maximize the basic actions and abilities of their characters, it’s all just dice and empty numbers. For the game to be fun, the players have to narrate and they have to think.
4.) How does your setting (or lack thereof) reinforce what your game is about?
Setting is totally up in the air now. I’m on my third setting in as many playtests. The problem I’m having is the very one targeted by this question. I want the setting to reinforce the system. I’ve got some ideas, but they just are taking a very long time to bake. I’m not sure what to do here yet.
5.) How does the Character Creation of your game reinforce what your game is about?
Well, obviously, I want the game to be about action, strategy, destiny, and stepping up. Destiny is covered explicitly in the chargen. It can be anything the player wants that he thinks he can achieve. Action and strategy are covered in the way contests are run. Players generate dice pools from one of six character stats, the character’s heritage, trade, and equipment. This pool can grant the player several options during each of his turns. If he rolls high enough, his character could get 3-5 actions that turn. The player can use them to defeat his foe, or save them for character advancement points instead. Each time he rolls, the player is faced with the choice, “do I win now, or do I stock up points for the future.” Stepping up comes from the “win now” choice. You’ve got 3-5 actions. Will you use them all on a full out attack? Will you use them all to get yourself in a better position next turn? Will you use some to attack and some to defend yourself? How will you balance your actions with your character’s motivation to achieve his destiny and your motivation as a player to win?
6.) What types of behaviors/styles of play does your game reward (and punish if necessary)?
Technically, the mechanics reward showing up to play and rolling dice, but the real rewards in this game aren’t mechanical- they’re social. Players are encouraged to step up in conflicts and show off their skills and strategies. Teamwork is highly prized, in fact, winning a combat is almost impossible alone. So in reality, the behaviors that are rewarded are stepping up, teamwork, and creative strategy.
7.) How are behaviors and styles of play rewarded or punished in your game?
There are two types of rewards- social and mechanical. Mechanical rewards are called Advancement Points. They are awarded at the beginning of each session and potentially given each time a player makes a roll. If a player chooses not to use 3 or more dice from his pool after rolling them, he may “bank” them. Those unused dice convert over into an Advancement Point which he can spend later, after the session. The social rewards will vary from group to group. The game provides ample opportunity to show off and be awesome. For those that consistently “turtle” during play, it is my hope they are needled by their playmates for being a “wuss” or whatever. For those who take advantage of what the system has to offer, it’s my hope they are heralded by their compatriots for being a hero.
8.) How are the responsibilities of narration and credibility divided in your game?
Whoever is rolling dice has narrational authority over everything. They control the environment, NPCs, and PCs. The object of play during the rolling dice times is to tell a badass story of what is happening. When dice aren’t being rolled, the players control their characters and the GM controls the environment.
9.) What does your game do to command the players' attention, engagement, and participation? (i.e. What does the game do to make them care?)
Because each time players roll the dice there is potential for them to take and narrate multiple actions by their characters, player attentiveness to what is happening is key to making the game work at any level. Each roll brings with it the responsibility and opportunity for narration and stepping up. Outside of the rolls, players have to be conscious of their character’s destiny and how they plan to achieve that. It’s one of the beigest flags in the game. So, its part of the player’s vision for what he wants. Therefore, every conflict has potential to advance his character’s destiny.
10.) What are the resolution mechanics of your game like?
For lack of a better word, each character has an array of Flags that help build the player’s dice pool. The most common Flags include a character’s stats, heritage, trade, gear, and relationships. Each of these is worth a certain die number and die size. Any time a player needs to roll, this is where he draws dice to create his pool. Once his pool is ready, he rolls the dice. He must arrange the dice in groups that add up to at least 8. For each group that adds up to 8 or more, the character gets one success. After the number of successes are determined, the player narrates what the character does.
11.) How do the resolution mechanics reinforce what your game is about?
By giving players multiple opportunities to take multiple actions in a turn, the onus is put on the player to use those actions to step up and be heroic. In games where certain values dictate how much or how well a character can do something or in games where certain feats or spells are so obviously superior it would be stupid to not to choose them, this sort of thing is not possible. The emphasis is put on what players do with their actions, not how well they studied the manual to discover which number, feat, spell, magic item, or whatever is most broken.
12.) Do characters in your game advance? If so, how?
Yes, characters advance. Whenever a player chooses to use 3 or more dice after achieving at least one success on a roll, he can bank them to add 1 advancement point to his character sheet. Advancement points can be used to improve the dice pools for his various flags, buy new passions, new relationships, abilities, or advantages.
13.) How does the character advancement (or lack thereof) reinforce what your game is about?
Advancement merely opens up more opportunities for the players to get more actions during contests. The higher the dice pools, the more actions he is likely to get. All spells, abilities, advantages, and relationships serve to make those actions more potent, they don’t dictate, suggest, or imply what actions the players should take to achieve whatever goal they are after.
14.) What sort of product or effect do you want your game to produce in or for the players?
I want the game itself to be a challenge for the players. I want the option it presents on every roll to make player stop, think, plan, then act. I want them to feel challenged, and then to enjoy beating the challenge and learning how to better assess a tactical situation. I want them to feel freedom- the freedom to have their character do anything they want in a contest. If they want him to leap to a beam, grab a rope, then swing down and lop off the head of their foe, then I want to provide them the chance to do that.
15.) What areas of your game receive extra attention and color? Why?
Right now, color is pretty sparse. I’d say there’s maybe three dozen abilities, perhaps 10 relationship options, and just a handful of spells. The lack of color is really the point of the game’s mechanics. I don’t want players distracted by the rules’ color. I want them focused on their play. When the setting comes along, I imagine it will have a great deal of color.
16.) Which part of your game are you most excited about or interested in? Why?
The resolution system. I think, and playtesting has proven, that it really does open up the playspace for real creativity.
17.) Where does your game take the players that other games can’t, don’t, or won’t?
The players add the power to the system, not the mechanics. Unlike most other adventure fantasy RPGs, there’s no real optimum option to buy, it all comes down to the players and what they want. Do they want a boring, toe-to-toe combat? Meh, okay. They can do that. Do they want to outflank, slide past, and cut their foes down from behind, above, and every-which-way? Sweet! They can do that too, and get socially rewarded for it by their gaming buddies.
18.) What are your publishing goals for your game?
PDF download within the next year.
19.) Who is your target audience?
Gamists who really like to do a lot of things when it’s their turn to act. Fans of fantasy who are tired of the overpowered rules and options in games like DnD or in MMORPGs like EQ and WoW. Fans of LotR and Pirates, since the actions of the actors is what I based the mechanics off of.
Comments welcome! :)
Peace,
-Troy
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Monday, January 28, 2008
And They're Off!
Heya,
Finally, despite all the production delays, The Holmes and Watson Committee is off to its customers. I am SO glad to finally have gotten them in the mail. I received them late Saturday afternoon from the USPS. I was pumped. Whew. There was so much I learned from the first year of DL-Quarterly. I'll be sharing some of that over at Socratic Design. Look for new posts there soon! :)
Peace,
-Troy
Finally, despite all the production delays, The Holmes and Watson Committee is off to its customers. I am SO glad to finally have gotten them in the mail. I received them late Saturday afternoon from the USPS. I was pumped. Whew. There was so much I learned from the first year of DL-Quarterly. I'll be sharing some of that over at Socratic Design. Look for new posts there soon! :)
Peace,
-Troy
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Naw Duh, Sherlock!
Heya,
My proof copy for The Holmes and Watson Committee is on its way. Getting used to the way my new printer does things took me a while. It's very different from my old one. That, and I always have trouble with technology. Anyway, I hope to have the proof by the end of the week and to send the game out by the end of the month. I'll be glad when I do.
Peace,
-Troy
My proof copy for The Holmes and Watson Committee is on its way. Getting used to the way my new printer does things took me a while. It's very different from my old one. That, and I always have trouble with technology. Anyway, I hope to have the proof by the end of the week and to send the game out by the end of the month. I'll be glad when I do.
Peace,
-Troy
Monday, December 3, 2007
So What Now?
Heya,
So where do I go from here? I've got several things to do. I'm hammering out stuff with the Holmes and Watson Committee and a printer. It **should** be taken care of this week. It probably won't be, give my history with printers. We'll see. There's also the next generation of DL-Quarterly. I've gotten the games written and initially playtested, but honestly... they're crap right now.
I really feel I may have cheated my subscribers a little bit with the first DL-Quarterly. I mean, I didn't know any better at the time. I've grown, learned, and matured a lot since I first put forth the idea of a subscription. They're ashcans. I didn't say ashcan when I first started talkinb about it because "ashcan" wasn't even in my vocabulary at the time. I had no idea what it was. Now I do. I also thought, at the time, that if you wrote a game and playtested it a bit, that meant it was fit to publish. Sillyness. I wish I could take some of what I've done back, but what's done is done. Now it's time to learn from my mistakes. So, DL-Quarterly 2 will come out when the games are good and ready, not before. That means getting them to real Ashcan status, not just written and played. It means getting them almost ready for the big time.
And then there's Socratic Design. Of all the things I've done with regard to RPGs, it's the one I am the most proud of. There's nothing that brings me more happiness than helping novice designers with their games. SD still gets a decent number of hits each day even though I haven't posted there in months! That tells me people still use it, and that makes me glad. I'm looking at it now, and it looks good to me... really good. The fourth anthology really sums up everything I thought about RPGs up to that point. So am I going to add more articles to it? I'm not sure. I need to get Holmes and Watson out before I do anything like that. I need the experience of carrying through on a promise before I can talk about design, theory, and publication again. So for now, Socratic Design is resting. Maybe permanently. I'm just updating the links and doing other maintance on it so it's more useable and looks nice. We'll see in another month or two where I go with it.
BTW, thanks to all those who've been sending my your support. I really do appreciate it. :)
Peace,
-Troy
So where do I go from here? I've got several things to do. I'm hammering out stuff with the Holmes and Watson Committee and a printer. It **should** be taken care of this week. It probably won't be, give my history with printers. We'll see. There's also the next generation of DL-Quarterly. I've gotten the games written and initially playtested, but honestly... they're crap right now.
I really feel I may have cheated my subscribers a little bit with the first DL-Quarterly. I mean, I didn't know any better at the time. I've grown, learned, and matured a lot since I first put forth the idea of a subscription. They're ashcans. I didn't say ashcan when I first started talkinb about it because "ashcan" wasn't even in my vocabulary at the time. I had no idea what it was. Now I do. I also thought, at the time, that if you wrote a game and playtested it a bit, that meant it was fit to publish. Sillyness. I wish I could take some of what I've done back, but what's done is done. Now it's time to learn from my mistakes. So, DL-Quarterly 2 will come out when the games are good and ready, not before. That means getting them to real Ashcan status, not just written and played. It means getting them almost ready for the big time.
And then there's Socratic Design. Of all the things I've done with regard to RPGs, it's the one I am the most proud of. There's nothing that brings me more happiness than helping novice designers with their games. SD still gets a decent number of hits each day even though I haven't posted there in months! That tells me people still use it, and that makes me glad. I'm looking at it now, and it looks good to me... really good. The fourth anthology really sums up everything I thought about RPGs up to that point. So am I going to add more articles to it? I'm not sure. I need to get Holmes and Watson out before I do anything like that. I need the experience of carrying through on a promise before I can talk about design, theory, and publication again. So for now, Socratic Design is resting. Maybe permanently. I'm just updating the links and doing other maintance on it so it's more useable and looks nice. We'll see in another month or two where I go with it.
BTW, thanks to all those who've been sending my your support. I really do appreciate it. :)
Peace,
-Troy
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
A Shadow in the Light
Heya,
It's been a long time since I've written anything online. I entered a self-imposed seclusion basically since July. At first, the reasons were many. I had a vacation coming up. I was finishing up my graduate practicum (the second most emotionally trying thing I've done this year). And I was really hyped about Magic: the Gathering's standard format at the time. Then in August, most of those reasons were gone and were replaced by another: my printer had failed to deliver the third game for DL-Quarterly on time.
I submitted it in May. I was promised it in June. Then I was promised it in July. Then in August. Then I heard nothing. After a lot of pestering, I got them to send me the proofs in early October. There were lots of problems. The font was all screwed up. The cover didn't fit the dimensions. Apparently they had known since May, but didn't tell me. I fixed these problems and resubmitted the game a week later.
I was told I'd have the games in a week or less. Then two weeks. Then three. After a bit more pestering, they told me that the spine was messed up, but they could fix it for $15. No big deal. I told them to do that. They said I'd have the books by the end of the week. Then the next week. After even more pestering, they said that they were having trouble lining up the pages. I told them to just print the books and send them to me.
I Finally got them today. 5 months and 29 days after submitting the request. They’ll be in the mail tomorrow. I have never been so ashamed and humiliated in my life. I let a lot of people down. And that disgusts me. I haven't even so much as posted on a message board in that time because I've been so ashamed of missing the deadline. I am really sorry, guys.
The books are passable- for an ashcan. They aren't up to the quality I expect. I don't plan on ever doing business with that printer ever again. Right now I'm so pissed I can't see strait. This whole experience has turned me off big time from publishing. I'm not sure where I'll go with design and publishing after The Holmes and Watson Committee comes out. I'm really not.
To all those who have a subscription to DL-Quarterly, I publicly apologize. I am deeply sorry that you had to wait so long. I regret immensely the delay. I am sickened by the experience.
Peace,
-Troy
It's been a long time since I've written anything online. I entered a self-imposed seclusion basically since July. At first, the reasons were many. I had a vacation coming up. I was finishing up my graduate practicum (the second most emotionally trying thing I've done this year). And I was really hyped about Magic: the Gathering's standard format at the time. Then in August, most of those reasons were gone and were replaced by another: my printer had failed to deliver the third game for DL-Quarterly on time.
I submitted it in May. I was promised it in June. Then I was promised it in July. Then in August. Then I heard nothing. After a lot of pestering, I got them to send me the proofs in early October. There were lots of problems. The font was all screwed up. The cover didn't fit the dimensions. Apparently they had known since May, but didn't tell me. I fixed these problems and resubmitted the game a week later.
I was told I'd have the games in a week or less. Then two weeks. Then three. After a bit more pestering, they told me that the spine was messed up, but they could fix it for $15. No big deal. I told them to do that. They said I'd have the books by the end of the week. Then the next week. After even more pestering, they said that they were having trouble lining up the pages. I told them to just print the books and send them to me.
I Finally got them today. 5 months and 29 days after submitting the request. They’ll be in the mail tomorrow. I have never been so ashamed and humiliated in my life. I let a lot of people down. And that disgusts me. I haven't even so much as posted on a message board in that time because I've been so ashamed of missing the deadline. I am really sorry, guys.
The books are passable- for an ashcan. They aren't up to the quality I expect. I don't plan on ever doing business with that printer ever again. Right now I'm so pissed I can't see strait. This whole experience has turned me off big time from publishing. I'm not sure where I'll go with design and publishing after The Holmes and Watson Committee comes out. I'm really not.
To all those who have a subscription to DL-Quarterly, I publicly apologize. I am deeply sorry that you had to wait so long. I regret immensely the delay. I am sickened by the experience.
Peace,
-Troy
Sunday, May 6, 2007
I think I see the light...
Heya,
I'm nearing the end of this term for my grad work. In the last 12 days I have been up late every night without a break writing and revising research papers, resource lists, and case studies. I've had enough. But thankfully, it's all coming to a close. Unless a professor sends me back yet another assignment for revision, I've only got one final left ahead of me. Once that is done, I get a week off before my next and final term. So around mid July, I'll finish my Master's work, get a nice pay raise, and FINALLY be able to get back to writing my games the way I want to. The light at the end of this tunnel is still far off, but at least I think I can see it now.
Peace,
-Troy
I'm nearing the end of this term for my grad work. In the last 12 days I have been up late every night without a break writing and revising research papers, resource lists, and case studies. I've had enough. But thankfully, it's all coming to a close. Unless a professor sends me back yet another assignment for revision, I've only got one final left ahead of me. Once that is done, I get a week off before my next and final term. So around mid July, I'll finish my Master's work, get a nice pay raise, and FINALLY be able to get back to writing my games the way I want to. The light at the end of this tunnel is still far off, but at least I think I can see it now.
Peace,
-Troy
Monday, April 30, 2007
So, How did I do?
Heya,
Well, this weekend was busy. My gradschool work got finished (which is way more important than gaming stuff). And I almost got done with the Blood Sands revision. It's rough. It needs a good proofread, but in another 2,000 words or so I'll be done. Ye-hah!
I wish game design were as simple as a Game Chef entry. It's not. This is seriously hard work guys, and there are designers out there who put in way more effort than I do (/wave Ralph Maza). So, once I get this finished its off to another set of eyes to tell me what they think. Thankfully this game's already gone through a couple playtests. It needs more tho.
Peace,
-Troy
Well, this weekend was busy. My gradschool work got finished (which is way more important than gaming stuff). And I almost got done with the Blood Sands revision. It's rough. It needs a good proofread, but in another 2,000 words or so I'll be done. Ye-hah!
I wish game design were as simple as a Game Chef entry. It's not. This is seriously hard work guys, and there are designers out there who put in way more effort than I do (/wave Ralph Maza). So, once I get this finished its off to another set of eyes to tell me what they think. Thankfully this game's already gone through a couple playtests. It needs more tho.
Peace,
-Troy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
